Linggo, Enero 18, 2015

After the Pope's visit: back to the old reality?

After the visit of the Pope, what will happen to the Filipino nation? After we were amazed with the charismatic head of the Universal Church, after the government did their best to offer warm and safe welcome to Pope Francis, after huge bulk of people gathered in different places just to take a personal glimpse on the Supreme Pontiff's smiling face, after the politicians took advantage on the Pope's popularity, after all, where are we heading to?

Pope Francis' message of mercy and compassion, if taken seriously, will engineer a very long road, a very long journey to dwell into. May the message of mercy and compassion be brought to the peripheries, be felt by everyone and be fulfilled not just by the Church but by the Filipino nation.

May the ghost of corruption, indifference, selfishness and lack of love that haunts the humanity be vanished and may we let mercy and compassion dwell in our individual hearts.

After the Pope's visit, let us not go back to the old reality of corruption, selfishness, indifference and all that hinders us to share our love and care to others, rather, let us continue our journey in fulfilling the two commandments of love, LOVE GOD ABOVE ALL AND LOVE OUR NEIGHBORS AS OURSELVES.

PRES. NOYNOY AQUINO SHOWED IMMATURITY AND INSENSITIVITY ON SPEECH BEFORE POPE FRANCIS

FULL TEXT: Aquino’s speech in the presence of Pope Francis at MalacaƱang

Your Holiness:
Colonialism was brought to our shores, partly by the efforts of the conquistadores, and partly through the efforts of the Church. When the clergy in that period was asked how they justified the injustices committed during the colonization of the Philippines, they responded by saying: the Kingdom of God is not of this earth.
With Vatican II however, this changed: Instead of being a pillar of the establishment, the Church began to question the status quo. My understanding of the changes inspired by Vatican II, and of the influence of liberation theology, was the notion that temporal matters affect our spiritual well-being, and, consequently, cannot be ignored. Two passages from scripture come to mind.
The first comes from Matthew, Chapter 22, Verses 36-40, in which a Pharisee posed this question to Jesus Christ, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord Your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, ‘you shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.”
The clear link between the two greatest commandments, as Christ put it, is further emphasized in another passage. In Matthew Chapter 25 Verses 35-36, Christ said, “For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’”
The Gospel challenges each member of the Church to go beyond almsgiving and mere charity, and to be concerned with injustice in temporal matters. We were further taught that if we do not intercede to make each person capable of exercising true freedom of choice, then we are not our brother’s keepers. One of the examples given to us involved a certain question. If it is a sin to steal, who is the greater sinner: the desperate man in an impossible situation forced to steal to feed his starving family, or the politician with an insatiable greed who, despite not having real material needs, stole from the public coffers?
When the Church engaged in temporal matters, it was truly working to bring the Kingdom of God apparent in this world. It was a living Church, a source of nurturing and support for the faithful, at a time when movies like “The Cardinal,” “The Shoes of the Fisherman,” and even “Jesus Christ Superstar” elicited deeper thoughts on how to further deepen the faith.
These teachings have been central to my family’s advocacy, which is understandable considering what we, along with millions of Filipinos, went through under the dictatorship. Then-President Marcos declared Martial Law in 1972, when I was 12-years-old, beginning an era in which the most fundamental rights of many Filipinos were flagrantly and routinely violated. It was in this environment that I came of age. In a sense, I had a front row seat to that tyranny and persecution. After all, the dictator wasted no time in having my father, one of his most influential and vocal opponents, imprisoned.
Martial Law deprived our family not only of a loving husband and father. Many of our friends avoided us. There were few who dared speak up. One of those was Fr. Toti Olaguer, SJ, who, right in the heart of the dictator’s most secure prison, had the courage to speak the truth about Mr. Marcos’ abuses, even as he was being videotaped. Many others in the Church, such as Jaime Cardinal Sin, Bishop Francisco Claver, and Bishop Antonio Fortich, just to name just a few, truly lived their faith and acted as followers of Christ in being their brothers’ keepers.
The courage and daring displayed by the clergy solidified my belief: Especially during the Martial Law years, the Church of the poor and oppressed shone vividly. The clergy was always at the forefront of those wanting to emulate Christ and carry the burdens for all of us. Indeed, they nourished the compassion, faith, and courage of the Filipino people. This allowed millions to come together as a single community of faith and make possible the miracle of the EDSA People Power Revolution.
Perhaps we had grown so accustomed to having this Church, always at the forefront of championing the rights of all, especially those of the marginalized, that we found it hard to understand its transformation. We were taught that the Catholic Church is the true church, and that there is constancy, for it upholds the truth at all times.
Hence, there was a true test of faith when many members of the Church, once advocates for the poor, the marginalized, and the helpless, suddenly became silent in the face of the previous administration’s abuses, which we are still trying to rectify to this very day. In these attempts at correcting the wrongs of the past, one would think that the Church would be our natural ally. In contrast to their previous silence, some members of the clergy now seem to think that the way to be true to the faith means finding something to criticize, even to the extent that one prelate admonished me to do something about my hair, as if it were a mortal sin. Is it any wonder then, that they see the glass not as half-full, or half-empty, but almost totally empty. Judgment is rendered without an appreciation of the facts.
I understand I am only human, and thus, I am imperfect. I ran for the Presidency despite my discomfort with the trappings of power, because if I passed up on this opportunity to effect real change, I would not have been able to live with myself, especially if the situation worsened. But in this effort, the participation of all is necessary. Everything I have said has not been to criticize, but to speak the truth, for the truth shall set us all free. If we are able to settle our differences, can we not benefit our people quicker?
This is why I was struck by what Your Holiness recently said to the Curia, when you warned them of the illnesses that not only Christians, but anyone in a position of power, is prone to, including that of thinking one’s self immortal or indispensable, and the danger of becoming sowers of discord through gossip and grumbling.
I appreciate and respect Your Holiness, for your role as a unifying and revitalizing voice, not just among Catholics, but also among all peoples of goodwill. Your statements bear witness to the compassion and understanding of Christ. Exhibiting the same humility, you eschew the trappings of your position, even to the necessary security preparations, which, I should admit, has been somewhat of a security nightmare for us. [Laughter] In all seriousness, who can deny that Your Holiness is truly living the life of one who is dedicated to advocating for the oppressed and marginalized?
I believe that you are a kindred spirit, one who sees things as they are, and is unafraid of asking, “Why not?” Some of your statements might have been shocking or offensive to some peers. But Your Holiness is meant to be the instrument through which the Kingdom of God is allowed to flourish. In your example, we see the wisdom of continuing to ask, “Why not?” We see joy, a sense of authentic service, and an insistence on a true community of the faithful. We thank the Lord for other kindred spirits like Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle, Father Catalino Arevalo, and Sister Agnes Guillen, who have always been voices of reason, and who are spiritual people who will always be natural allies, along with so many others. We would like to think that even more will join us in the truth, in the fullness of time.
In the fight to transform society, one cannot help but be heartened by the fact that we are not alone. When we tread this path with people such as yourself, along with the millions you have inspired, we gain the courage to do what needs doing, the optimism to dream about what we can achieve in unity with one another, and the opportunity to turn that dream into a shared reality, with the grace of Almighty God. The Filipino people, in whose name I welcome you today, ask your blessing; may we find more mercy and compassion in our lives.
Thank you. Good day.

Miyerkules, Enero 14, 2015



BETRAYAL, CONDEMNATION AND REDEMPTION


In life, I would say that there are three superseding themes that underlie to whatever ecstatic emotions we may feel in every step we make and in every moment we open our eyes and put our gaze to everything that may catch our attention. These three preponderant themes are betrayal, condemnation and redemption. We can never escape betrayal, condemnation and redemption. In our own ways, in our own lives and in our own circumstances, we were, we are and we will always be confronted with these three superseding themes.

In the movie Ben-Hur, it was very clear that in parallel to the life of Jesus Christ, he himself also experienced his own betrayal, conviction and redemption. His own betrayal was portrayed in the movie when he was betrayed by his childhood friend whom later on turn into his most mortal enemy. His childhood friend Messala knew for a fact that the death of the Roman Governor was authentically an accidental one. Yet, because of Messala’s stoned heart he betrayed Ben-Hur together with the rest of his family. It even came to a point that Ben-Hur’s mother and sister was inflected by the most dreaded disease at that time which was leprosy when they were incarcerated by Messala.

The betrayal of Ben-Hur runs in parallel to Jesus Christ Betrayal also when He was betrayed by the people around Him—His apostles. When Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus with a kiss in exchange of monetary amount. But it was not only Judas who betrayed Jesus, even His most trusted Apostle Peter the one whom Jesus called the Rock or Petrus in whom He said “you are rock and on this rock I will build my Church”. When Peter was confronted three times during the suffering of Jesus, three times also he betrayed Jesus by denying Jesus Christ.
In the movie also, condemnation was also part of the prevailing themes. He was sold as a slave. There he suffered tremendous struggles yet there also he encountered the most important character in his life—Jesus Christ.
In the life of Jesus also, He Himself also experience condemnation when the crowd shouted “crucify Him”. They were the same crowd who also shouted “Hosanna son of David, Hosanna in the highest.” In those times, Pontius Pilate saw no any reason to convict and crucify Jesus, yet because of the dominant uproar of the crowd, Jesus Christ was crucified.
After the betrayal and condemnation, there awaits the most consoling part and that is the redemption. Ben-Hur experienced redemption when he was liberated and made an heir to a commander whose life he saved from death.
Jesus Christ’s redemption happened when He was resurrected from the death and acquired redemption not just for Himself but to the entire humanity.
In our lives we also experience our own betrayal, condemnation and redemption. Each of us has our own story to tell of how betrayal, condemnation and redemption happened in our lives.
More or less two thousand years ago, from Judea to Samaria, the early community of believers also had their fair share of their own betrayal, condemnation and redemption. When they were persecuted they suffered a lot from the hands of their persecutors. Even though there were some who abandoned their faith yet the greater wave of believers prefer to embrace death in the name of their faith. After their sacrifices from numerous betrayals and convictions, now we reap the fruits, the harvest of which they sowed—the fruits of faith which was originally sowed by Christ Himself—the redemption.
            The movie was such a blatant manifestation that in this world—betrayal, condemnation and redemption are the circular themes that continuously happened as we continue our journey in life. Now the question is, do we need to get rid of this cycle? For me no we do not need to get rid of this cycle aside from the reality that we cannot go away from this cycle, in this cycle also we will be able to appreciate the reality of our humanity and that is our finiteness. We are finite beings, we can never take control of our lives. At times that we thought that we are already getting in control of our lives there will always be occasions where in we will be disturbed and the control that we were saying will just fall into pieces and we will just realize that we are holding nothing anymore and we have nothing to go to except God.

            This finiteness that is being manifested through our experience of betrayal, condemnation and redemption is the greatest gift that we received from God because without this gift of finitude we will not anymore seek and see God in our life.

Supreme Pontiff’s visit: a disaster?



We the Filipino people awaits the visit of the supreme pontiff enthusiastically especially we who belong to the Universal Church. Both the local Church and the Government are very keen in every single detail of the Pope’s visit to our country to ensure a smooth, secure and momentous event in our religious and civil lives. However, what if the head of a billion people as well as the head of the Vatican state will be assassinated in the Philippine soil, what impact will it cater to the entire Filipino nation?

Some of the following scenarios would warrant a critical understanding and preparation.

1.      The Filipino nation will be put in a bad light in the face of the world.
2.      The government’s capacity to secure the safety of the supreme pontiff will be mocked by the international community.
3.      The Oversees Filipino Workers good reputation that has been cemented through times will be ruined in a split of a second.
4.      The trust for every Filipino in the international arena will be smashed.
5.      The well taken cared morale of every Filipino that was offered to us by our heroes will turn into ashes.

The above mentioned scenarios are just few of the many things that will happen in case the Supreme Pontiff will be assassinated in our homeland. It did not concern to us Christians only or to the Universal Church. It concerns to every Filipino to ensure the safety of the Pope since we are not talking here of religion only but as a nation.

For the visit of the Supreme Pontiff not to become a disaster, let us all cooperate in ensuring the safety of the Pope. Let us obey the rules and regulations set by the Church and the Government of the Philippines. Let us obey every security detail and report to appropriate authorities whoever and whatever may cause any untoward incident of the Supreme Pontiff’s visit in our country.


As Filipinos, let us WELCOME THE SUPREME PONTIFF not just with our whole heart but with our whole being.